Ian Blakeman, Governor
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly commit Gross Negligence by concealing a fraud, which is a fraud in and of itself, and fraud is equal to Gross Negligence.
Notice of Irrevocable Estoppel by Acquiescence;
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent,
Dear: Ian Blakeman,
I hope this email finds you well and in good spirits.
It is now established by irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence on and for the record and let the record show that you: Ian Blakeman is in acceptance of this lasting tacit binding agreement by implied admission by absence of a response, and that your silence is: Ian Blakeman's acquiescence, acceptance, dishonour and admission of the concealment of the frauds and falsehoods given by: Ian Blakeman and confirms that: Ian Blakeman understands, accepts and consents to the following points below are true and correct:
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly breach the PSO 4600, 3.4 Mandatory Requirement, to conceal Sealed Order of Conviction and a warrant of committal because they are false instruments in violation of the: County Court Act 1984 §135: Penalty for falsely pretending to act under authority of court.
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly act with gross negligence in the concealment of the fraudulent documentation fabricated by a Steven Cobb at the Royal Courts of Justice in the unlawful and false imprisonment of: Jason-Steven: Wong by a fabrication of a court case, counterfeiting an authority of court for the purpose of the concealment of the fabricated family court case that the Nottinghamshire County Council CEO: Adrian Smith used to create Orders falsely pretending to act under authority of court used in the theft of: Jason-Steven: Wong's daughter, Biological and Intellectual Property.
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly commit Gross Negligence by concealing the fraud, which is a fraud in and of itself, and fraud is equal to Gross Negligence.
Ian Blakeman consciously and wilfully acting with negligence and in dereliction of his duty, dishonourably and deliberately failed to respond to my deadlines and therefore: Ian Blakeman does understand, accept and consent that: Ian Blakeman is guilty of the points: ~1, ~2, and ~3 above by tacit assent by acquiescence, and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence that what is stated above is true and correct and he is in total agreement.
Proof of service:
First Email Requesting the Committal Order Clarification, sent on Tuesday, 12th December 2023 at 17:22: Opened Seventeen (17) times.
Second Email Requesting the Committal Order Clarification, sent On Friday, 29th December 2023 at 10:43: Opened One-Hundred and Forty-Nine (149) times.
Courtesy-Notice, sent on Tuesday, 2nd January 2024 at 2:05 PM: Opened Two (2) times.
Final-Notice of default & Opportunity to Cure, sent On Tuesday, 9th January 2024 at 16:12: Opened One (1) time.
Notice of Estoppel, sent On Wednesday, 14th February 2024 at 18:22: Opened One (1) time.
Notice of Estoppel,sent On Thursday, 15th February 2024 at 10:53: Opened One (1) time.
You: Ian Blakeman, are evidenced by the above proof of service fully aware and therefore have consciously and wilfully acted with negligence and by your actions have consciously and wilfully concealed this now proven fraud committed by the Stephen Cobb at the Royal Courts of Justice and Nottinghamshire County Council employees that: Adrian Smith holds vicarious liability for their actions, this fact is now undisputable, and on and for the record.
My instructions are that you: Ian Blakeman:
activate your company's anti-fraud policy and notify the court to act accordingly and report your criminal actions to the police post haste, and;
You are to supply me with a copy of your professional indemnity insurance policy details, and notify your indemnity insurance company of the harm you have caused by your actions of gross negligence and false imprisonment of: Jason-Steven: Wong and supply us with an insurance claim form poste haste by return.
I look forward to your timely response and your duty to fulfill your instructions by me and by the law: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
· Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
· This will be used as evidence,
· Silence can only be construed as you: Ian Blakeman is knowingly and willingly consenting by tacit assent by acquiescence to everything stated above, by implied admission by absence of a response, and that you are in full acceptance and dishonour.
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved and invoked,
Date: 21st of February, 2024.
Cc: to whom it may concern;
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent,
I invite you to sign the petition against Court Order Scams
https://bit.ly/ComLawCourt
Notice of Estoppel
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 10:53, : Jason: Wong. <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
: Jason: Wong. <houseofwong2020@gmail.com>
14 Feb 2024, 18:22
to ian.blakeman
: Addressee-Only: Ian Blakeman
: ~HMP Pentonville Prison,
: ~Caledonian Road,
: ~London,
: ~N7 8TT
: Jason-Steven: Wong.
c/o: ~xxxxxxxxxxx
: ~East Leake
: ~ Loughborough
: ~Nottinghamshire
: [xxxxxx]
: Ængland, Not the United Kingdom
: Notice of Estoppel;
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent,
Dear: Ian Blakeman,
I hope this email finds you well and in good spirits.
It is now established on and for the record and let the record show that you: Ian Blakeman is in acceptance of this lasting tacit binding agreement by implied admission by absence of a response, and your silence is: Ian Blakeman's acquiescence, acceptance, dishonour and admission of the concealment of the fraud and falsehoods committed and did conspire with Stephen Cobb in the unlawful and/or false imprisonment of me: Jason-Steven: Wong, for the purpose of the cover up of the theft of: Jason-Steven: Wong' daughter and Biological Property by counterfeiting an authority of a court and this confirms that: Ian Blakeman understands, accepts and consents to the following points below are true and correct by silence and tacit assent by acquiescence:
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly breach the PSO 4600, 3.4 Mandatory Requirement, to conceal a false instrument: County Court Act 1984 §135: Penalty for falsely pretending to act under authority of court.
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly act with gross negligence in the concealment of the fraudulent documentation fabricated by Steven Cobb at the Royal Courts of Justice in the unlawful and false imprisonment of: Jason-Steven: Wong.
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly commit Gross Negligence by concealing a fraud, which is a fraud in and of itself, and fraud is equal to Gross Negligence.
I have taken note that you have failed to respond to my deadlines and therefore: Ian Blakeman does understand, accept and consent that: Ian Blakeman is guilty of points: ~1, ~2 and ~3 above by tacit assent by acquiescence.
Out of extra courtesy I give you: Ian Blakeman a further Seven (7) days to give response to my notice of Estoppel.
You are hereby instructed to give a full and transparent response to my Final-Notice of default & Opportunity to Cure at your earliest possible convenience, and in any event no later than by 4pm Wednesday the 22nd of February, 2024, If you ignore this last courtesy offer to rebut what is stated above it will mean you consent to the validity of the claim.
I look forward to your timely response: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
· Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
· This will be used as evidence,
· Silence can only be construed as you: Ian Blakeman knowingly and willingly consent by tacit assent by acquiescence, by implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer and that you are in dishonour and agreement.
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved and invoked,
Date:15th of February, 2024.
: cc to whom it may concern,
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent.
Document/notice above sent with corrections for the correction of the document/notice below sent 14th February 2024 Notice of Estoppel
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 18:22, : Jason: Wong. <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
: Addressee-Only: Ian Blakeman
: ~HMP Pentonville Prison,
: ~Caledonian Road,
: ~London,
: ~N7 8TT
: Jason-Steven: Wong.
c/o: ~xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: ~East Leake
: ~ Loughborough
: ~Nottinghamshire
: [xxxxxxx]
: Ængland, Not the United Kingdom
: Notice of Estoppel;
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent,
Dear: Ian Blakeman,
I hope this email finds you well and in good spirits.
It is now established on and for the record and let the record show that you: Ian Blakeman is in acceptance of this lasting tacit binding agreement by implied admission by absence of a response, and your silence is: Ian Blakeman's acquiescence, acceptance, dishonour and admission of the concealment of the fraud and falsehoods committed and did conspire with Stephen Cobb in the unlawful and/or false imprisonment of me: Jason-Steven: Wong, for the purpose of the cover up of the theft of: Jason-Steven: Wong' daughter and Biological Property by counterfeiting an authority of a court and this confirms that: Ian Blakeman understands, accepts and consents to the following points below are true and correct by silence and tacit assent by acquiescence:
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly breach the PSO 4600, 3.4 Mandatory Requirement, to conceal a false instrument: County Court Act 1984 §135: Penalty for falsely pretending to act under authority of court.
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly act with gross negligence in the concealment of the fraudulent documentation fabricated by Steven Cobb at the Royal Courts of Justice in the unlawful and false imprisonment of: Jason-Steven: Wong.
Ian Blakeman did knowingly and willingly commit Gross Negligence by concealing a fraud, which is a fraud in and of itself, and fraud is equal to Gross Negligence.
I have taken note that you have failed to respond to my deadlines and therefore: Ian Blakeman does understand, accept and consent that: Ian Blakeman is guilty of points: ~1, ~2 and ~3 above by tacit assent by acquiescence.
Out of extra courtesy I give you: Ian Blakeman a further Seven (7) days to give response to my notice of Estoppel.
You are hereby instructed to give a full and transparent response to my Final-Notice of default & Opportunity to Cure at your earliest possible convenience, and in any event no later than by 4pm Wednesday the 22nd of February, 2024, If you ignore this last courtesy offer to rebut what is stated above it will mean you consent to the validity of the claim.
I look forward to your timely response: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
· Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
· This will be used as evidence,
· Silence can only be construed as you: Ian Blakeman knowingly and willingly consent by tacit assent by acquiescence, by implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer and that you are in dishonour and agreement.
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved and invoked,
Date:14th of February, 2024.
: cc to whom it may concern,
Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent.Take Notice
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 16:12, : Jason: Wong. <xxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
: Private & Confidential: Do Not Ignore:
: Final-Notice of default & Opportunity to Cure;
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent
Dear Ian Blakeman, and all concerned,
You must give a response to this email by 4pm Friday the 12th of January 2024, failure to do so may lead to legal action in your private capacity.
It has now been established on and for the record by implied admission by absence of a response by Ian Blakeman that: Ian Blakeman the living man has agreed by tacit acquiescence that Ian Blakeman is complicit in the unlawful imprisonment or false imprisonment of me: Jason-Steven: Wong.
Ian Blakeman you have, on and for the record, denied me or concealed the evidence required by me three times now, and therefore your silence is acquiescence, however out of courtesy I afford you a further three days for one last opportunity to supply the evidence by which you may prove to me that you are not complicit in the unlawful imprisonment or false imprisonment of me: Jason-Steven: Wong, and restore my position and activate your anti-fraud policy and conduct an internal investigation poste haste.
: Take Notice:
On and for the record the Ministry of Justice has also confirmed as of the 8th of January 2024 that they have no record of either Case numbers: 31CF0477722 or: FD23F00038 that are both involved with the unlawful imprisonment or false imprisonment of me: Jason-Steven: Wong, and the concealment of the theft of my daughter by Nottinghamshire County Council.
On and for the record I can confirm that all my emails have been served and confirm that they have been received and opened:
Email sent by me to ian.blakemanBE@justice.gov.uk: on Tuesday, 2 January 2024, as of today it has been opened 2 times.
Email sent by me to ian.blakemanBE@justice.gov.uk: on Friday, 29 December 2023, as of today it has been opened 148 times.
Email sent by me to ian.blakemanBE@justice.gov.uk: on Tuesday, 12 December 2023, as of today it has been opened 17 times.
I look forward to your timely response: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
This will be used as evidence,
Silence is acquiescence.
Seven Principles of Public Life Evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QX1AcgRURs
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved,
Date: 9th of January, 2024.
: cc to whom it may concern,
Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent.Courtesy Notice
: Jason: Wong. <xxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
: Courtesy Notice;
: Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent
Dear Ian Blakeman, and all concerned,
I hope this email finds you well and in good spirits, I'm wishing you all the very best for the new year.
Sadly but not surprisingly so far my previous emails", that you have viewed multiple times", have been totally ignored or refused a response by yourself as you have failed to supply me a response so far, this may be because the response could only be with false instruments counterfeiting the court's authority and would be self incriminating.
The paramount reason I needed this information/evidence to clear my name is", on and for the record", because I had it confirmed by Stephen Cobb, (acting Judge), Elain Duff, (Judges Clerk), Michael Tomlinson, (Acting Solicitor General) and Serkan Bastug, (Applicant's Solicitor), that no application fee has ever been paid to legitimately commence any proceedings against me, there is no public record of any particulars of claim to have formed any proceedings against me, and I have never been served with any proceedings issued by the court of record or any other court.
I must also inform and make you aware that the Nottingham magistrates court has already formally acquitted me in November 2022 and given me a certificate of acquittal for this fabricated charge of contempt of court, and that you are at the present moment unlawfully and unjustly holding me under", which is a trespass on me without the court's authority and a kidnapping of me without an authentic or valid sealed order of conviction issued by the court, proven and now established by the fact that neither yourself or the Royal Courts of Justice can supply an alleged sealed order of conviction issued by the court or any fabricated unsealed or unsigned Warrant for custodial sentence alleged to have been created by such a fabrication.
The three strike rule is hereby being applied by me and I am formally notifying you of your third and final chance not to be in dishonour, in accordance with the seven principles of public life and your common law duty to be open and transparent that you are to adhere to, kindly supply me the evidence and further information or clarification I need by 4pm on Friday the 5th of January 2024, or you will be knowingly and wilfully tacitly agreeing and confirming by implied admission by absence of a response on and for the record for the third and final time that no such legitimate court instruments exist, and that the fabricated court instruments that may exist, you will honour your common law duty and thoroughly investigate and completely expose the false instruments you may have been supplied and activate the prisons anti-fraud policy and or activate an internal and external review for these crimes and procedure breaches by notifying the correct authorities, and help to restore my position by freeing me from this unjust and unlawful imprisonment post haste.
I look forward to your timely response: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
This will be used as evidence,
Silence is acquiescence.
Seven Principles of Public Life Evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QX1AcgRURs
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved,
Date: 2nd of January, 2024.
: cc to whom it may concern,
Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent.Reminder
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 10:43, : Jason: Wong. <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxgmail.com> wrote:
Dear Ian Blakeman,
I hope this email finds you well and in good spirits, I write to remind you of the email I sent you on Tuesday the 12th of December 2023, also sent to PGDLondonoffice@justice.gov.uk, (evidenced below), for which you have not yet given a response.
I require further information for which I will explain below:
According to the information contained within PSO 4600, Link below: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f745260e90e0740cf4eb0d1/pso-4600-unconvicted-unsentenced-civil-prisoners.pdf, where It states at:
PSO 4600, 3.4: Mandatory Requirement:
The prison must notify the Official Solicitor of the reception of all prisoners committed for contempt of court (including persons committed under section 63(3) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980). A copy of the warrant, together with the name, prison number and address of the prison should be sent to:
The Office of the Official Solicitor
81 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1DD
Also, a medical report must be provided on request to the Official Solicitor, when the health of the prisoner committed for contempt makes it necessary to consider discharge.
Kindly forward me", at your earliest possible convenience", an official certified copy of the warrant that is a mandatory requirement for you to send and that you therefore should have sent to the Office of the Official Solicitor in accordance with: PSO 4600, 3.4 Mandatory Requirement above.
Kindly supply me the above information I require by 4pm on Tuesday the 1st of January 2024, or confirm in writing or by absence of a response that no such court instruments exist and activate the prisons anti-fraud policy and or activate an internal review for this procedure breach.
I look forward to your timely response: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
This will be used as evidence,
Silence is acquiescence.
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved,
Date: 29/12/2023.
: cc to whom it may concern,
Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent.Committal Order Clarification
From: : Jason: Wong. <xxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 17:22
Subject: Committal Order Clarification Ref: Alleged Case Number: FD23F00038
To: <>
Dear: Ian Blakeman,
I hope this email finds you well and in good spirit, I am currently being held captive within Pentonville Prison that you are the acting Governor, and I am requesting the following information or clarification for what the legal instrument", ie. committal order", is that: Stephen Cobb, the man acting as Mr Justice Cobb at the Royal Courts of Justice Queen's Bench Civil Division has created, and what it is", ie. committal order sealed by an authority of the court", that must have been handed to your staff for me to be committed to your prison lawfully.
The Royal Courts of Justice Queen's Bench Civil Division has tacitly agreed that there is no sealed order of conviction by an implied admission by absence of a response to my lawful request, where I requested the following:
Naturally, I wish to consider my lawful and legal options, and require the following items on
which I was allegedly convicted: -
1) A copy of the information which was laid by the accuser to commence the
proceedings, pursuant to Rule 99 of the Magistrates’ Rules 1981.
2) The Sealed Order of Conviction, issued by the court
3) A copy of the Anti-fraud policy, where the above do not exist.
Can you kindly supply me an office copy of any such order or court instrument made by: Stephen Cobb, the man acting as Mr Justice Cobb at the Royal Courts of Justice, that has been sealed by the court granting you the authority and permission for my committal.
Please supply this at your earliest possible convenience due to this trespass upon me by the fact that my freedom and liberty has been taken without my consent and by an unfounded claim of an authority of a court.
Kindly supply me the above by 4pm on Tuesday the 19th of December 2023 an office copy of the court instrument, ie committal order sealed by the court, or confirm in writing or by absence of a response that no such court instrument exists and activate the prisons anti-fraud policy or internal review for this procedure breach.
I look forward to your response: Let justice been done though the heavens fall,
Implied admission by absence of a response or non substantive legal answer,
This will be used as evidence,
Silence is acquiescence.
Sincerely,
: Jason S. Wong
: All Rights Reserved,
Date: 12/12/2023.
: cc to whom it may concern,
Notice to agent is notice to principal; Notice to principal is notice to agent.